|
toomasmoore (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
why is everyone arguing over this trick, i don't really think it matters if there are slight variations, most trick have variations anyway. this is my favourite version though and i think it's probably the closest to the way it's described in the encyclopedia of ball juggling
JeremeK (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Still wrong. It's 522.
kaffemat (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i ment to say 511... nice vid :)
eMretsiM (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
221 wouldn't work at all. In siteswap, 1 is a pass directly from one hand to the other, and 2 is a pause while holding a ball. Therefore it couldn't possibly be 221.
kaffemat (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
its a 221 mills mess
Gorthorn (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I Prefer This Way.The Capitals Symbolize My Anger At Your Face.
JeremeK (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
That's a much smaller and looser version than what the Encyclopedia of Ball Juggling describes. The way it's described in the EoBJ is the way I teach it in my video.
BradytheStageCrewGuy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This is great! This trick reminds me of Reverse Chops mixed with a little of Burke's. AWESOMENESS!!!
eMretsiM (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
There's a link in the video description.
Spathever (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I actually came up with this myself. It's easy as hell :) |
