|
selleckman2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You are telling me in 8 years the Democrats have not made a 9/11 montage? Saying they haven't is a strong statement.
Greenbunny45 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Olbermann wouldn't say anything about it because he wouldn't have to. The democrats would never do that. Why do republicans like you always try to argue your point with hypothetical questions? Hypothetical questions are not arguments to justify fear mongering.
selleckman2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Olbermann wouldn't say anything about it if Democrats made that video. I can't take anything a bigoted, biased person like Olbermann says seriously. His rhetoric is simply to undermine the foundation of the Republican Party and to counter anything and everything done by said party.
deeliciousplum (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
the use of the 911 memorial footage for announcing who is best to become president is a form of assault on the memories of those who have past away and to those who continue to suffer as a result of this historic catastrophe. Olbermann simply placed his morals ahead of his job description as like anyone with a reasonable amount of consciousness and humanity would have done.
saved03 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Many during Jesus's time believed the same about Jesus ruining the Jewish religion. By no means am I compairing Bush to Christ. He is a far cry from Him as of all of us are also. Just because the majority is oppossing someone does not always mean the majority is correct. Even if you are doing the right thing you will be criticized by others. I'm not saying Bush did every thing correctly. I'm just saying not all of the criticism that Bush is getting is correct.
saved03 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes this was the staw that broke the camal's back for NBC. Olbermann since than has been fired from the Anchor's chair at MSNBC along with Chris Matthews. Olbermann is not the spokesman for 9/11 victims. That is what he was trying to be and not an Anchor for which he was hired to do.
saved03 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Also to add to your commit. I don't think that they believe there is no threat. I think that it's just pure laziness that this country sees out of Washington. Time and time again from both sides. I will say this though. Since 9/11 we not seen 1 terrorist attack on our soil. Something must be working because back in the 90's we were hearing about terrorist attacks almost on a yearly bases. Two of which were on our soil. One foregin and one domestic. They were 2 years apart from each other.
saved03 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I wish they would close off the southern border. Not only is it a National Security problem. It is an economical and a welfare problem. Illegals strain our social services and create lower wages. Thank God that Oklahoma passed House Bill 1804. We saw illegals leave the state as fast as they came into the state. They uprooted and just left. The rest of the country needs to do the same thing. Don't allow them to work or get on social services. They will stop coming to this country illegally.
truthseeker1164 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I'm a conservativw who voted for that idiot, and I can't understand why YOU don't see the damage Bush has done and is doing to this country. The NeoCons you seem to hold in such high esteem are more dangerous than the tax-and-spend, militarily weak Left. At least if the left has their way, the country will be taken over. If the NeoCons have their way, thet'll be busy giving it away.
truthseeker1164 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
How the hell can anyone feel secure when the "War on Terror" doesn't involve closing off our southern border ? How can any reasonable, thinking American believe there is a terror threat, when obviously the administration doesn't give a tinker's damn who comes across that border ? I they can only estimate how many Mexicans cross the border each day, how can they assure us that terrorists aren't also ? They can't, therefore, there must not actually be a threat. |
